shervieux
Apr 13, 01:53 PM
WOW!:D
I bought FCE for $299 in 2008 when I got my macbook. I have had trouble mastering it. I would get a somewhat nice video after hours of editing, only to render and playback to a blue "Not Rendered" video taking up 2gb of my hard drive space. So I uninstalled it, and it has been sitting in my drawer. I also needed more features with an easier interface, so I end up doing some work in iMovie (HD6 and 11) and then bring it into Adobe Premiere Elements 9. I did not want to spend $1500 on a full blown editing software to render nice blue screens.
Looks like FC is going to have the ease of iMovie and Adobe Premiere elements, but be very advanced so I will not be spending hours and screaming because I messed up syncing..
Very nice price tag too....
*Oh, and the only reason I chose Adobe Premiere Elements 9, is because Adobe brought back some of the stuff they stripped out - and i was a heavy user of the older version when I was on Windows.
Very looking forward to the new FC. No more messing up syncing to squeeze in a shot or some audio.
Adding to my wish list...
I bought FCE for $299 in 2008 when I got my macbook. I have had trouble mastering it. I would get a somewhat nice video after hours of editing, only to render and playback to a blue "Not Rendered" video taking up 2gb of my hard drive space. So I uninstalled it, and it has been sitting in my drawer. I also needed more features with an easier interface, so I end up doing some work in iMovie (HD6 and 11) and then bring it into Adobe Premiere Elements 9. I did not want to spend $1500 on a full blown editing software to render nice blue screens.
Looks like FC is going to have the ease of iMovie and Adobe Premiere elements, but be very advanced so I will not be spending hours and screaming because I messed up syncing..
Very nice price tag too....
*Oh, and the only reason I chose Adobe Premiere Elements 9, is because Adobe brought back some of the stuff they stripped out - and i was a heavy user of the older version when I was on Windows.
Very looking forward to the new FC. No more messing up syncing to squeeze in a shot or some audio.
Adding to my wish list...
manu chao
May 4, 01:29 PM
Deleted.
dornoforpyros
Sep 9, 05:24 PM
Good show! Body art is fun, I'm still considering my next peace of ink.
ironjaw
Nov 2, 03:05 PM
I'm pretty happy with my K800i Sony Ericsson with 3MP camera:D
fluidinclusion
Sep 5, 05:38 PM
This is almost as bad as powerbook g5 rumors.
Goddamn.
Shut up!
Then why did you even click on the link to read the messages???
Goddamn.
Shut up!
Then why did you even click on the link to read the messages???
mr_flibble
Oct 14, 04:32 PM
I really don't know how it is now, but last time I checked Preview, it was missing one important functionality - when I selected any picture from directory to preview, there was no possibility to view the next or previous one from within the application using just arrow keys or space/backspace, enter, whatever.. I always had to select all pictures I would possibly like to see. It was quite annoying. Hope it is finally fixed now?
MattZani
Mar 7, 01:32 PM
http://i883.photobucket.com/albums/ac37/Digitalize_/Screenshot2011-03-07at191726.png
CFreymarc
Apr 12, 12:50 AM
For the last time.... it's not coming out this year.
iPad = spring
iPhone = summer
iPod = fall
Once a year cycle. Stupid source.
I swear some of these rumors are nothing but a mole hunting expedition by Steve and company to handle security leaks inside Apple. Considering some of the directors and VPs over at Apple have Intelligence Community connections, this does not surprise me one bit. Curious what those in the current IC are doing instead of these reindeer games.
iPad = spring
iPhone = summer
iPod = fall
Once a year cycle. Stupid source.
I swear some of these rumors are nothing but a mole hunting expedition by Steve and company to handle security leaks inside Apple. Considering some of the directors and VPs over at Apple have Intelligence Community connections, this does not surprise me one bit. Curious what those in the current IC are doing instead of these reindeer games.
kxbcvoi
Apr 18, 08:33 AM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
I will replace iPhone 3G with white iPhone 4. I can't wait any longer.
I will replace iPhone 3G with white iPhone 4. I can't wait any longer.
ten-oak-druid
Apr 11, 06:21 PM
I think this is a rumor Apple releases to keep people busy and off the scent of true rumors.
Dcuellar
Apr 21, 06:15 PM
http://www.audiogalaxy.com/
already does this for all the music in your itunes library
And Subsonic is better...
If you have an iPhone you can use iSub. Best combination out there.
Honestly, though... I'm really interested in seeing what iTunes will do with the cloud. While audiogalaxy and subsonic work, they require you always have YOUR computer on. If the price is right I'm going to the cloud.
already does this for all the music in your itunes library
And Subsonic is better...
If you have an iPhone you can use iSub. Best combination out there.
Honestly, though... I'm really interested in seeing what iTunes will do with the cloud. While audiogalaxy and subsonic work, they require you always have YOUR computer on. If the price is right I'm going to the cloud.
Hellhammer
May 3, 02:48 PM
The base model has a 5660 @ $800.
What base model? I was looking at the 3797$ configuration you linked, which has 1663$ CPU in it..
BTW, X5660 (http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=47921) costs 1219$... A config with that is around 3000$.
I have no idea what you are trying to achieve since no matter how much you try to justify it or post false specs and prices, it won't make the SP Mac Pro any better value. It costs a lot more than Dell's equivalent. Period.
What base model? I was looking at the 3797$ configuration you linked, which has 1663$ CPU in it..
BTW, X5660 (http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=47921) costs 1219$... A config with that is around 3000$.
I have no idea what you are trying to achieve since no matter how much you try to justify it or post false specs and prices, it won't make the SP Mac Pro any better value. It costs a lot more than Dell's equivalent. Period.
valkraider
Apr 6, 06:18 PM
Yawn.
Wake me up when it supports Exchange 2003 just like all of their Windows versions.
Que the one MS fanboy who will say it's old tech and Microsoft will never support it.
Guess the team that works on Office 2010 for the PC never got that memo since that works like a dream with Exchange 2003.
Or, you could be like the Office for Mac team and happily keep your head in the sand.
+1
Why can my Apple iPhone 4.3.1 work perfectly with our company Exchange 2003 server - but my Microsoft Outlook 2011 can't?
Microsoft pisses me of sometimes.
I buy Office 2011 for my Mac and it doesn't work with my company exchange server. Microsoft says upgrade the exchange server. My company says buy a PC, Outlook 2010 on the PC works just fine with their Exchange server.
So if MS is supposedly ditching whatever they use for OutlookPC->Exchange2003 connectivity then fine. Why can't MS do what the iPhone and iPad do to talk to Exchange2003?
What can I use on my Mac to hook up to Exchange 2003 so that I don't have to use a PC?
--
"Officer, I know I was going faster than 55mph, but I wasn't going to be on the road an hour." -Steven Wright
Posted from my iPhone using the "Tapatalk" app.
Wake me up when it supports Exchange 2003 just like all of their Windows versions.
Que the one MS fanboy who will say it's old tech and Microsoft will never support it.
Guess the team that works on Office 2010 for the PC never got that memo since that works like a dream with Exchange 2003.
Or, you could be like the Office for Mac team and happily keep your head in the sand.
+1
Why can my Apple iPhone 4.3.1 work perfectly with our company Exchange 2003 server - but my Microsoft Outlook 2011 can't?
Microsoft pisses me of sometimes.
I buy Office 2011 for my Mac and it doesn't work with my company exchange server. Microsoft says upgrade the exchange server. My company says buy a PC, Outlook 2010 on the PC works just fine with their Exchange server.
So if MS is supposedly ditching whatever they use for OutlookPC->Exchange2003 connectivity then fine. Why can't MS do what the iPhone and iPad do to talk to Exchange2003?
What can I use on my Mac to hook up to Exchange 2003 so that I don't have to use a PC?
--
"Officer, I know I was going faster than 55mph, but I wasn't going to be on the road an hour." -Steven Wright
Posted from my iPhone using the "Tapatalk" app.
adnoh
Mar 6, 04:11 PM
I can dream... :D
The easter eggs get me pumped for Spring and Easter.
Can you link to the r8 wallpaper pls?
The easter eggs get me pumped for Spring and Easter.
Can you link to the r8 wallpaper pls?
Willis
Oct 27, 06:12 AM
I have a not-quite-offtopic question - I know you can exchange your computer for a new one within 14 days if you buy a MB now. (would you have to pay a restocking fee?)
What about if applecare is sending you a new MB to replace an old defective ibook? You didn't buy it, so you don't have a receipt. Could you exchange it for a C2D?
This isn't an entirely greed based query - after years of dealing with the logic board fiasco I'm nervous about getting a lemony macbook that randomly shuts down.
As of last night, theres now a fix!!
What about if applecare is sending you a new MB to replace an old defective ibook? You didn't buy it, so you don't have a receipt. Could you exchange it for a C2D?
This isn't an entirely greed based query - after years of dealing with the logic board fiasco I'm nervous about getting a lemony macbook that randomly shuts down.
As of last night, theres now a fix!!
wordoflife
Apr 4, 09:54 PM
OMGEEE Yes!
I hope its a bit more than an iPhone 4 with an A5 and better camera in it. Mainly, I hope iOS5 delivers.
I hope its a bit more than an iPhone 4 with an A5 and better camera in it. Mainly, I hope iOS5 delivers.
pyramid6
Sep 6, 05:26 PM
You can quote me on that!
I thought of this as well, the problem I see, it would work great if you wanted to call someone, but what if they wanted to call you. I guess voice mail, but ew.
P6
I thought of this as well, the problem I see, it would work great if you wanted to call someone, but what if they wanted to call you. I guess voice mail, but ew.
P6
iphone3gs16gb
Apr 10, 08:15 PM
This will be one of the few books I will read in my life...
OatmealRocks
Apr 11, 08:52 PM
From what I've seen of it on cars, carbon fiber is quite susceptible to scratching, and scratches can look very prominent. ., but IMO not a replacement for unibody aluminum.
Err aluminum is susceptible to scratching.. have you not notice. I'm sure if Apple decides to use carbon fiber it will be well though out product. I'm looking forward this.
Err aluminum is susceptible to scratching.. have you not notice. I'm sure if Apple decides to use carbon fiber it will be well though out product. I'm looking forward this.
jaw04005
Nov 30, 06:44 PM
Space is the biggest problem...
Damn this Kinect is one greedy mofo in regards to space. I could not use it in my own room due to lack of space, the same room where Move & Wii both have no issues what so ever. This is going to be its biggest problem by far.
Were talking 10-12 feet for best results. That's quite some distance from your TV and if you have to factor in a room having sofa's & chairs - it soon is evident your going to need a bigger home. Kids can forget this in their bedrooms anyway.
Once I was able to give it the room it demands it worked great, but as I say without that room - forget it.
I thought you were just exaggerating, but after buying Kinect this weekend I found out it requires you to place the sensor:
- within 2 to 6 feet of the floor
- where the floor is visible to the sensor
- in a position where there is 6 to 8 feet of "free" space for single player or 8 feet of "free" space for two players
- centered below or on top of your TV (no angles, TV mount not included)
- within clear sight (given)
- well lit area with minimal ambient noise
Ridiculous. You would need at minimum a 42" HDTV and a radius of 8 feet around the Kinect sensor to play adequately.
I refuse to complicate my living room setup by putting the 360 in there. So, I guess I"ll just send the damn thing back as there is no possible furniture configuration in my game room to meet those requirements.
Too bad.
Damn this Kinect is one greedy mofo in regards to space. I could not use it in my own room due to lack of space, the same room where Move & Wii both have no issues what so ever. This is going to be its biggest problem by far.
Were talking 10-12 feet for best results. That's quite some distance from your TV and if you have to factor in a room having sofa's & chairs - it soon is evident your going to need a bigger home. Kids can forget this in their bedrooms anyway.
Once I was able to give it the room it demands it worked great, but as I say without that room - forget it.
I thought you were just exaggerating, but after buying Kinect this weekend I found out it requires you to place the sensor:
- within 2 to 6 feet of the floor
- where the floor is visible to the sensor
- in a position where there is 6 to 8 feet of "free" space for single player or 8 feet of "free" space for two players
- centered below or on top of your TV (no angles, TV mount not included)
- within clear sight (given)
- well lit area with minimal ambient noise
Ridiculous. You would need at minimum a 42" HDTV and a radius of 8 feet around the Kinect sensor to play adequately.
I refuse to complicate my living room setup by putting the 360 in there. So, I guess I"ll just send the damn thing back as there is no possible furniture configuration in my game room to meet those requirements.
Too bad.
wovel
Apr 22, 01:06 PM
I'd get the New Yorker in a minute if it was even remotely priced the way it would be for a print subscription. I'd pay even more--due to the convenience factor, but not $5 an issue.
The demand is not there because their prices are unrealistic.
Indeed, someone should tell them they would sell more magazines if they were priced even remotely reasonable.
Look at newsweek and Bloomberg Businessweek for how you might do subscriptions. Popular Science is priced right too, but their interface is just a bit over the top. Still a decent magazine though.
The demand is not there because their prices are unrealistic.
Indeed, someone should tell them they would sell more magazines if they were priced even remotely reasonable.
Look at newsweek and Bloomberg Businessweek for how you might do subscriptions. Popular Science is priced right too, but their interface is just a bit over the top. Still a decent magazine though.
amateurmacfreak
Aug 7, 06:09 PM
I need to figure out how to d/l it. I dont have internet at home yet and I would like to d/l it here at work and play it at home tonight.. anybody know how?
Try reading the posts above yours??
Try reading the posts above yours??
Pallish
Oct 22, 05:54 PM
Does anyone know if Multithreaded Open GL for PPC is enabled in this build of Leopard?
nsayer
Dec 14, 11:37 AM
First of all, I can only see a small section of map when in an area with no coverage. Second of all, the automatically detected location on my iPhone 2G is wildly inaccurate to the tune of a couple of miles.
So move the map to where the problem occurred before submitting the report.
This is a poorly designed application from AT&T
Um, no. You just don't know how to use it properly. That's not AT&T's fault.
So move the map to where the problem occurred before submitting the report.
This is a poorly designed application from AT&T
Um, no. You just don't know how to use it properly. That's not AT&T's fault.
