toughboy
Aug 8, 10:15 AM
That would be my guesses. You think your upset, I bet Steve Jobs is pissed as hell. It makes me wonder if there are better ways to do this if you don't want to pay for all the hardware needed to support 100 million views in the first 24 hours... Something like a queueing system that requires you to click on something when it is ready to serve you video. What must be killing them is all the people reloading and re-requesting the video.
Let me tell a better way to do this:
LET PEOPLE DOWNLOAD A KEYNOTE!
That way:
1) I wont re-re-request a movie just to view once (or anymore time I want)
2) I'll distribute the video through other sources and servers (or by hand-to-hand)
Can someone explain the logic behind the stream?!?!
Let me tell a better way to do this:
LET PEOPLE DOWNLOAD A KEYNOTE!
That way:
1) I wont re-re-request a movie just to view once (or anymore time I want)
2) I'll distribute the video through other sources and servers (or by hand-to-hand)
Can someone explain the logic behind the stream?!?!
skunk
Mar 5, 01:04 PM
That's empty speculation. You weren't there.
You have no idea what happened.Sure, it's all speculation, apart from the fact that he drove off with her clinging to the hood, and continued for 35 miles, reaching very high speeds. This is more than enough by itself to qualify as attempted murder.
You have no idea what happened.Sure, it's all speculation, apart from the fact that he drove off with her clinging to the hood, and continued for 35 miles, reaching very high speeds. This is more than enough by itself to qualify as attempted murder.
LouieSamman
Apr 11, 11:17 PM
iPad 3= iPad 2 without lightleak
iPad 3 is going to have a redesign for sure. Expect more.
Retina Display, no home button, thinner, increase battery life of up to 12hrs.
These are my guesses.
iPad 3 is going to have a redesign for sure. Expect more.
Retina Display, no home button, thinner, increase battery life of up to 12hrs.
These are my guesses.
baryon
Jul 16, 07:49 AM
The truth is out there.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone 4 while holding it in my left hand, specifically at the bottom left corner.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone 4 while holding it in my left hand, specifically at the bottom left corner.
mgauss7
Apr 12, 09:02 AM
Yeah Steve is ON IT !!!! iIT !!
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/11/head-tracking-allows-glasses-free-3d-on-ipad/)
Article Link: Head Tracking Allows Glasses Free 3D on iPad (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/11/head-tracking-allows-glasses-free-3d-on-ipad/)
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/11/head-tracking-allows-glasses-free-3d-on-ipad/)
Article Link: Head Tracking Allows Glasses Free 3D on iPad (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/11/head-tracking-allows-glasses-free-3d-on-ipad/)
bcharna
Jul 12, 04:07 PM
Bad move...
Obviously, there is huge demand for cheaper Macs. Cheap doesn't equal bad!
Mac minis should start at $399
iMacs should start at $899
MacBooks should start at $799
MacBook Pros should start at $1499
Mac Pros should start at $1499
There is no reason this wouldn't work.
Cheap does usually equal bad... for example, $399 is enough for a Mac mini with a Celeron processor, thats BAD!!
Obviously, there is huge demand for cheaper Macs. Cheap doesn't equal bad!
Mac minis should start at $399
iMacs should start at $899
MacBooks should start at $799
MacBook Pros should start at $1499
Mac Pros should start at $1499
There is no reason this wouldn't work.
Cheap does usually equal bad... for example, $399 is enough for a Mac mini with a Celeron processor, thats BAD!!
kdarling
Mar 29, 12:22 PM
But I am sure that Nokia knew a very long time ago that Apple was infringing and did nothing (which is perfectly their right)...and let Apple make billions...then file a lawsuit to cash in.
The iPhone came out in mid 2007. It's not like Apple gives out their schematics and source code, so it could take a while for Nokia to figure out which patents are being used.
(Just as it took Apple several years to figure out which patents to sue HTC over.)
In this case, Nokia fairly quickly started asking Apple to pay royalties for the wireless technologies they were using. It's Apple that has delayed for years.
Think about it...why would Nokia file suit immediately to earn, say, a pesky $5 or $20 million (and give Apple a chance to make the product better) when Nokia can wait years and earn hundreds of millions or billions?
That only makes sense for patent holders that want a one-time payment. Nokia licenses their patents per device, and the GSM/WiFi ones probably can't be gotten around, so it matters less when they sue.
And again, Apple's known about many of these patents for years. They apparently would rather rake in the profits now and pay later.
The iPhone came out in mid 2007. It's not like Apple gives out their schematics and source code, so it could take a while for Nokia to figure out which patents are being used.
(Just as it took Apple several years to figure out which patents to sue HTC over.)
In this case, Nokia fairly quickly started asking Apple to pay royalties for the wireless technologies they were using. It's Apple that has delayed for years.
Think about it...why would Nokia file suit immediately to earn, say, a pesky $5 or $20 million (and give Apple a chance to make the product better) when Nokia can wait years and earn hundreds of millions or billions?
That only makes sense for patent holders that want a one-time payment. Nokia licenses their patents per device, and the GSM/WiFi ones probably can't be gotten around, so it matters less when they sue.
And again, Apple's known about many of these patents for years. They apparently would rather rake in the profits now and pay later.
johndallas999
Apr 26, 02:44 PM
If anybody wants to see what a white iphone 4 looks like near a white iPad 2, then here you go:
http://cultofmac.cultofmaccom.netdna-cdn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/DSCN1531.jpg
Source: My post here (http://www.cultofmac.com/what-the-white-iphone-4-try-the-big-shoulder-devices-150-conversion-kit-review/86511).
????????????? The purpose of putting those 2 next to each other is.......???????????
http://cultofmac.cultofmaccom.netdna-cdn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/DSCN1531.jpg
Source: My post here (http://www.cultofmac.com/what-the-white-iphone-4-try-the-big-shoulder-devices-150-conversion-kit-review/86511).
????????????? The purpose of putting those 2 next to each other is.......???????????
Unspeaked
Apr 4, 03:13 PM
This doesn't make sense. Phone plans cost the same on a carrier for iPhone and android; therefore the only difference could be the cost of the phone.
In which case, if you are willing to buy an out of date android phone to get it for less, why not consider a year old iPhone which usually sells for half to three quarters off.
I believe most android phones at release are priced around $200 same as the iPhone.
What you say would be correct in a world where Verizon & AT&T were the only phone carriers (which isn't that unlikely anymore, but that's a different story...).
As the poster you reply to states, you can get phone plans for $25 - $30 with unlimited data/texts and while Android phones are options here, iPhones are not.
In which case, if you are willing to buy an out of date android phone to get it for less, why not consider a year old iPhone which usually sells for half to three quarters off.
I believe most android phones at release are priced around $200 same as the iPhone.
What you say would be correct in a world where Verizon & AT&T were the only phone carriers (which isn't that unlikely anymore, but that's a different story...).
As the poster you reply to states, you can get phone plans for $25 - $30 with unlimited data/texts and while Android phones are options here, iPhones are not.
Missveronica
Jun 22, 11:02 AM
http://forums.bestbuy.com/t5/Mobile-Phones-Mobile-Broadband/UPDATED-6-22-iPhone-4-Pre-order-FAQ/td-p/117476
Just read that they will NOT be receiving the white phone after all, which is what we all suspected!
Just read that they will NOT be receiving the white phone after all, which is what we all suspected!
NewYorkRanger
Apr 12, 11:51 AM
http://www.cio.com/images/content/articles/body/2011/03/2011_year-of-ipad.jpg
This x 100.
People are really stupid, sometimes.
yeah I suppose this also confirms that there will be no iPhone 5 in 2011. Or OS X Lion. Or any substantially improved Macs. Or any great shakes in the iPod lineup... :rolleyes:
Get real. Steve said that because it needed to be said. The rumors of a Sept iPad 3 were swirling and Apple didn't want to risk sales being impacted.
I'm not saying that there WILL be an iPad 3 in 2011... but I'm saying that his statement has no relevance to that argument. I think that slide would still have been there even if Steve was inwardly smiling thinking "untill the iPad 3 in September... *evil grin*"
See above comment as it applies to you. Not sure if you can read this with your tinfoil hat falling off of your head and covering your eyes, though.
This x 100.
People are really stupid, sometimes.
yeah I suppose this also confirms that there will be no iPhone 5 in 2011. Or OS X Lion. Or any substantially improved Macs. Or any great shakes in the iPod lineup... :rolleyes:
Get real. Steve said that because it needed to be said. The rumors of a Sept iPad 3 were swirling and Apple didn't want to risk sales being impacted.
I'm not saying that there WILL be an iPad 3 in 2011... but I'm saying that his statement has no relevance to that argument. I think that slide would still have been there even if Steve was inwardly smiling thinking "untill the iPad 3 in September... *evil grin*"
See above comment as it applies to you. Not sure if you can read this with your tinfoil hat falling off of your head and covering your eyes, though.
SandynJosh
Mar 29, 09:49 PM
If Nokia has had these patents for 10 years before the iPhone, then why didn't they act when the iPhone was first released?
That idea occurred to me too. It seems like they are throwing suits against the wall hoping they can get some to stick... It's like, Well those didn't stick, let's see if any of these can get the job done..."
Personally I'd think they would have tried the suits with the best chances first. If so, they they've shot their wad and with this round Nokia is hoping for a miracle.
That idea occurred to me too. It seems like they are throwing suits against the wall hoping they can get some to stick... It's like, Well those didn't stick, let's see if any of these can get the job done..."
Personally I'd think they would have tried the suits with the best chances first. If so, they they've shot their wad and with this round Nokia is hoping for a miracle.
PghLondon
Apr 29, 10:50 AM
Don't be a :confused: tard.
There are FIVE different models with FIVE different specifications. I can buy them online with the hassle of having to select a provider.
The rest of the world does count them this way ... check
http://store.apple.com/de/browse/home/shop_iphone/family/iphone?mco=MTAyNTQzMjI
http://store.apple.com/it/browse/home/shop_iphone/family/iphone?mco=MTAyNTQzMjI
for starters.
The MINORITY of people on the planet count them your way.
Colors and sizes. Even better. Wow, you're digging deep man. And every statistical count of phone purchases count them as two phones: 3GS and 4
But keep on pretending you're right, it's really quite amusing. I bet you're all red in the face right now.
There are FIVE different models with FIVE different specifications. I can buy them online with the hassle of having to select a provider.
The rest of the world does count them this way ... check
http://store.apple.com/de/browse/home/shop_iphone/family/iphone?mco=MTAyNTQzMjI
http://store.apple.com/it/browse/home/shop_iphone/family/iphone?mco=MTAyNTQzMjI
for starters.
The MINORITY of people on the planet count them your way.
Colors and sizes. Even better. Wow, you're digging deep man. And every statistical count of phone purchases count them as two phones: 3GS and 4
But keep on pretending you're right, it's really quite amusing. I bet you're all red in the face right now.
greenstork
Aug 17, 04:46 PM
I personally have about 500 DVDs sitting in my office on the wall, and the only ones I or anyone else "re-watches" over and over again is animation films, such as Toy Story, Finding Nemo, etc, because kids will sit and watch cartoons over and over again and not get sick of them. I will be happy if all they do is allow rental downloads, then I will cancel my membership with Blockbuster and their $20 a month fee. Here is my "wish list" for Apple on this Movie Store.
1) Open a movie section on itunes with at least 2K movies in content, ready to download and rent for $2.99 - $4.99 (have a fixed price, but no more then $4.99) to be viewed for unlimited times in 1 week. Instead of waiting for it to download completely, have it stream to the TV (through mac mini or new video airport express) with a good enough buffer that doesn't interrupt the movie. While you are watching it or not, continue to download to the HD so you can transfer it to an iPod to watch later or take to a friends house, on a plane, in the car, etc.
2) Movies must be better quality then current TV Shows!
3) Release the Widescreen Video iPod with 60GB and 120GB and better battery life and screen.
4) Release a Mac Mini the have Tivo capability, frontrow "style" movie store that you can access and rent movies from across the room, and a huge HD between 250GB � 500GB so you can import your current DVD collection. This would be my strategy if I was apple. And I know some people on here are screaming that they want to burn it to a disc, but simply ask yourself how many times have I watched the last movie I bought? Once! Maybe twice when you had to share your new found favorite movie with your friends or family. The movies you are going to want to buy, you will go to Wal-Mart and buy them for $15 each, then import them into the new mac mini!
You forgot the remote. GOT to have a good remote for any sort of living room application.
1) Open a movie section on itunes with at least 2K movies in content, ready to download and rent for $2.99 - $4.99 (have a fixed price, but no more then $4.99) to be viewed for unlimited times in 1 week. Instead of waiting for it to download completely, have it stream to the TV (through mac mini or new video airport express) with a good enough buffer that doesn't interrupt the movie. While you are watching it or not, continue to download to the HD so you can transfer it to an iPod to watch later or take to a friends house, on a plane, in the car, etc.
2) Movies must be better quality then current TV Shows!
3) Release the Widescreen Video iPod with 60GB and 120GB and better battery life and screen.
4) Release a Mac Mini the have Tivo capability, frontrow "style" movie store that you can access and rent movies from across the room, and a huge HD between 250GB � 500GB so you can import your current DVD collection. This would be my strategy if I was apple. And I know some people on here are screaming that they want to burn it to a disc, but simply ask yourself how many times have I watched the last movie I bought? Once! Maybe twice when you had to share your new found favorite movie with your friends or family. The movies you are going to want to buy, you will go to Wal-Mart and buy them for $15 each, then import them into the new mac mini!
You forgot the remote. GOT to have a good remote for any sort of living room application.
DrEasy
Sep 12, 03:15 PM
Also: when will they add Apple Lossless support? Since I can't navigate easily between many albums, might as well just store a few good-quality ones...
DotCom2
Apr 10, 08:03 PM
I'll be reading it on my iPad 3! :D
patrickfish
Jul 15, 08:47 PM
The Death Grip is not a myth. I can hold my phone for 20 seconds or so and lose all signal all the way from 5 bars. On top of that, I've had issues importing photos on the phone into iPhone. This is also my second iPhone 4 this month due to said issues.
I just returned my iPhone 4 and got a full refund.
If Apple says there is not an issue, then they have their heads up their a$$es.
PatF
BTW, I have always held my phones in the Death Grip fashion. My hearing is much better on my left ear, I can't listen with my right, neither can my sister who is deaf in her right ear.
I have consistently had dropped calls with the way I hold it. I am NOT going to hold it "Different" because of a design flaw. I hold it tight to my left ear (I'm a rightie) and I hold it covering the part people are saying you are not supposed to hold it. Why? Because that is most comfortable for me and the way I have always held it.
You know, this whole iPhone 4 things has been a debacle. The lost phone, the search of a person's computer and home because of it, no iPhone 4 WHITE news, the crappy rollout, the lack of phones and news. The iPhoto problem. It's just tainted any good feelings I've had for the iPhone 4.
On top of that, I HATE the boxy feel of the phone. It's hard to hold and does not fit comfortably and you never know which side is which.
I'm happy with my 3GS now and I'm glad I did not sell it!
P
I just returned my iPhone 4 and got a full refund.
If Apple says there is not an issue, then they have their heads up their a$$es.
PatF
BTW, I have always held my phones in the Death Grip fashion. My hearing is much better on my left ear, I can't listen with my right, neither can my sister who is deaf in her right ear.
I have consistently had dropped calls with the way I hold it. I am NOT going to hold it "Different" because of a design flaw. I hold it tight to my left ear (I'm a rightie) and I hold it covering the part people are saying you are not supposed to hold it. Why? Because that is most comfortable for me and the way I have always held it.
You know, this whole iPhone 4 things has been a debacle. The lost phone, the search of a person's computer and home because of it, no iPhone 4 WHITE news, the crappy rollout, the lack of phones and news. The iPhoto problem. It's just tainted any good feelings I've had for the iPhone 4.
On top of that, I HATE the boxy feel of the phone. It's hard to hold and does not fit comfortably and you never know which side is which.
I'm happy with my 3GS now and I'm glad I did not sell it!
P
farmboy
Apr 10, 11:48 PM
You do realize that Jobs is not an engineer. Nor has he ever programmed anything.
I have read all the patents where he's the first name listed. There's only about a half dozen, mostly ideas related to iPods and icons. And that gooseneck monitor arm. Oh, and he came up with the slide-to-power-off thingie you see if you hold down the iPhone power button.
My favorite: while the iPhone was being worked on by his employees, he applied for a patent for a telephone dial UI driven by a clickwheel. It was almost as cool as the Onion's "MacBook Wheel (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA)" parody:
Jealous much? Of course you do realize that the order of inventors on a patent means absolutely nothing. This is not academia. And since when do all computer inventions have to come from "engineers" and "programmers"?
I have read all the patents where he's the first name listed. There's only about a half dozen, mostly ideas related to iPods and icons. And that gooseneck monitor arm. Oh, and he came up with the slide-to-power-off thingie you see if you hold down the iPhone power button.
My favorite: while the iPhone was being worked on by his employees, he applied for a patent for a telephone dial UI driven by a clickwheel. It was almost as cool as the Onion's "MacBook Wheel (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA)" parody:
Jealous much? Of course you do realize that the order of inventors on a patent means absolutely nothing. This is not academia. And since when do all computer inventions have to come from "engineers" and "programmers"?
Anonymous Freak
Jan 22, 02:44 PM
MacBook Pro does have dedicated GPU, ATI Radeon X1600. MacBook hasn't.
And a separate GPU makes ZERO difference for Photoshop. Zero. Photoshop does not use the GPU any more than Microsoft Word or TextEdit do. It doesn't offload any processing to the GPU the way, say, Motion does. Yes, there are 'Quartz Composer Effects' available in some programs that use the GPU, but if you're using Photoshop, you're probably using Photoshop-native effects, which are solely CPU dependent. (Moving to CS3 will be a SIGNIFICANTLY bigger upgrade than moving from a MacBook to a MacBook Pro, since CS3 will be Universal, whereas CS2 is only PPC, and only runs via Rosetta.)
Really, why do people think that a GPU helps in still photo editing, music editing, or even video editing in non-GPU-enabled programs? (Which includes iMovie, Final Cut Express, and even Final Cut Pro.) The only major media apps that use the GPU are Aperture (which uses it solely for drawing to the screen, not for applying effects,) Motion, and Shake. And even Aperture WORKS on integrated-graphics just fine, it just isn't as smooth. Same with Shake. The no-GPU-no-use limit on Final Cut Studio is artificial, and based solely on the GMA950's inability to run Motion, which is part of the Final Cut Studio.
And a separate GPU makes ZERO difference for Photoshop. Zero. Photoshop does not use the GPU any more than Microsoft Word or TextEdit do. It doesn't offload any processing to the GPU the way, say, Motion does. Yes, there are 'Quartz Composer Effects' available in some programs that use the GPU, but if you're using Photoshop, you're probably using Photoshop-native effects, which are solely CPU dependent. (Moving to CS3 will be a SIGNIFICANTLY bigger upgrade than moving from a MacBook to a MacBook Pro, since CS3 will be Universal, whereas CS2 is only PPC, and only runs via Rosetta.)
Really, why do people think that a GPU helps in still photo editing, music editing, or even video editing in non-GPU-enabled programs? (Which includes iMovie, Final Cut Express, and even Final Cut Pro.) The only major media apps that use the GPU are Aperture (which uses it solely for drawing to the screen, not for applying effects,) Motion, and Shake. And even Aperture WORKS on integrated-graphics just fine, it just isn't as smooth. Same with Shake. The no-GPU-no-use limit on Final Cut Studio is artificial, and based solely on the GMA950's inability to run Motion, which is part of the Final Cut Studio.
rmwebs
Jul 16, 03:22 AM
I'm hoping the press confrence is to tell us that Steve's been fired!
The guy has screwed up big time....but of course (some of) you guys wont agree because you would happily lick his boots!
The guy needs to be removed - he's done.
The guy has screwed up big time....but of course (some of) you guys wont agree because you would happily lick his boots!
The guy needs to be removed - he's done.
paul4339
Apr 12, 11:09 AM
Only question. Why?
Some say Apple need to buy Netflix. Have those of you even considered what Netflix charges for monthly streaming?
$8
Apple will never let customers eat that much for so little. The day Apple buys Netflix, DVDs would stop, and streaming would go up to $30 a month.
Promised.
Agree. If Apple bought Netflix they'll have to raise prices. Netflix is inexpensive, Apple is typically premium.
Also, Netflix Inc is quite expensive ($12B) and other than a subscriber base, I'm not sure if they have technology or business model that isn't too hard to duplicate...at least nothing strategic to Apple. P.
Some say Apple need to buy Netflix. Have those of you even considered what Netflix charges for monthly streaming?
$8
Apple will never let customers eat that much for so little. The day Apple buys Netflix, DVDs would stop, and streaming would go up to $30 a month.
Promised.
Agree. If Apple bought Netflix they'll have to raise prices. Netflix is inexpensive, Apple is typically premium.
Also, Netflix Inc is quite expensive ($12B) and other than a subscriber base, I'm not sure if they have technology or business model that isn't too hard to duplicate...at least nothing strategic to Apple. P.
CWT1965
Apr 12, 06:50 AM
Oh, I'm not writing him off. I hope he sticks around for a long time.
When Robert Jordan, author of The Wheel of Time fantasy/adventure series of novels was told he would die before he could finish the 12th and final book in his 21-years-in-the-making series, he spent a much of his time and energy during his final two years compiling notes and telling his wife and the author who'd be hired to finish the series on how all of the plotlines should be resolved. And Christopher Hitchens, after being diagnosed with esophogeal cancer, has continued to work as much as his health permits him to because he finds value in doing so.
For those who want to read into this news one way or the other, I think it comes down to this: If Jobs considers his legacy to be of the utmost importance, then he could make this a top priority if given a terminal diagnosis. If he considers other things � family, friends, his pet yorkie, his $1 nature/nurture wager with Bill Gates � more important, he'd arrange to make them a priority.
The "Why now?" question can be answered one of two ways:
1. He's dying.
2. He's doing OK and has time to do so while on leave, so why not.
As long as we don't know the answer, this news just gives us something else to speculate about.
I think it is the latter tbh, Steve has never cared what anyone thinks of him bar his wife and kids so I don't believe that he simply wants to set the record straight before he dies, more likely to me he is doing it as a time filler while he is on leave as he is bored with daytime tv, gardening, reading or whatever he is doing on sick leave, I would imagine that this biography is because he is bored while on leave but not well enough to return to work
When Robert Jordan, author of The Wheel of Time fantasy/adventure series of novels was told he would die before he could finish the 12th and final book in his 21-years-in-the-making series, he spent a much of his time and energy during his final two years compiling notes and telling his wife and the author who'd be hired to finish the series on how all of the plotlines should be resolved. And Christopher Hitchens, after being diagnosed with esophogeal cancer, has continued to work as much as his health permits him to because he finds value in doing so.
For those who want to read into this news one way or the other, I think it comes down to this: If Jobs considers his legacy to be of the utmost importance, then he could make this a top priority if given a terminal diagnosis. If he considers other things � family, friends, his pet yorkie, his $1 nature/nurture wager with Bill Gates � more important, he'd arrange to make them a priority.
The "Why now?" question can be answered one of two ways:
1. He's dying.
2. He's doing OK and has time to do so while on leave, so why not.
As long as we don't know the answer, this news just gives us something else to speculate about.
I think it is the latter tbh, Steve has never cared what anyone thinks of him bar his wife and kids so I don't believe that he simply wants to set the record straight before he dies, more likely to me he is doing it as a time filler while he is on leave as he is bored with daytime tv, gardening, reading or whatever he is doing on sick leave, I would imagine that this biography is because he is bored while on leave but not well enough to return to work
steve2112
Aug 6, 09:10 PM
Funny that I wonder if those are/were the drink of choice of the people who made the laws...hmm!
Well, given some of the stupid stuff they do, they are drinking SOMETHING. Not all of them are stupid, because there has been a bill introduced two or three years in a row to increase the limit to 7% or 10%, but it has been shot down either in committee or on the floor each time. Supposedly, one of the ancient guys who has been there forever said something to the effect of "what's wrong with the beer we already have?"
Forgot to add that I really like Old Speckled Hen. Good stuff.
Well, given some of the stupid stuff they do, they are drinking SOMETHING. Not all of them are stupid, because there has been a bill introduced two or three years in a row to increase the limit to 7% or 10%, but it has been shot down either in committee or on the floor each time. Supposedly, one of the ancient guys who has been there forever said something to the effect of "what's wrong with the beer we already have?"
Forgot to add that I really like Old Speckled Hen. Good stuff.
Sinsinnati
Oct 17, 12:53 PM
IMHO, it still is a marketing issue. Mac-ads on Dutch TV?? Most people don't even know Apple make the iPods! (:eek: ) If they see an iMac, some even call it the "iPod-computer", but have no idea it can do stuff their PC can do too.
LOL, I can see someone saying that.
LOL, I can see someone saying that.
