xUKHCx
Oct 13, 09:39 AM
If there are "top secret" features, I would guess they would have to be apps if it's going to be released at MWSF? There couldn't be significant changes to the operating system without developer testing before then. Unless they are going to introduce the "top secret" features after Vista has shipped (someone was saying that's next month?) But even that seems like a really quick testing phase for developers.
Things like TimeMachine, Spaces, Expose would have all be considered a part of the operating system but in Leopard they appear as individual apps.
Things like TimeMachine, Spaces, Expose would have all be considered a part of the operating system but in Leopard they appear as individual apps.
mgauss7
Apr 12, 09:02 AM
Yeah Steve is ON IT !!!! iIT !!
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/11/head-tracking-allows-glasses-free-3d-on-ipad/)
Article Link: Head Tracking Allows Glasses Free 3D on iPad (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/11/head-tracking-allows-glasses-free-3d-on-ipad/)
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/11/head-tracking-allows-glasses-free-3d-on-ipad/)
Article Link: Head Tracking Allows Glasses Free 3D on iPad (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/11/head-tracking-allows-glasses-free-3d-on-ipad/)
Caris
Jan 12, 03:31 PM
I've changed already, But I think it's for the better.
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/5662/screenshot20110112at212.png
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/5662/screenshot20110112at212.png
mrblack927
Apr 26, 03:19 PM
You do have a brain, right?
That's uncalled for. I don't understand what the purpose is either. Why don't you explain it if you know so much.
That's uncalled for. I don't understand what the purpose is either. Why don't you explain it if you know so much.
FleurDuMal
Mar 28, 04:50 AM
Hopefully the premium will come down in price now, if not at retail, then at least second hand as a flood of old 360's come onto the ebay and from the people who simply must have the best of everything.
Is there anyone who's actually struggled with the current size hard drive? Will I have any use for such a huge hard drive if I don't actually use it as a media centre?
Anyway, I much prefer the white 360. Though neither are as ugly as the PS3.
Is there anyone who's actually struggled with the current size hard drive? Will I have any use for such a huge hard drive if I don't actually use it as a media centre?
Anyway, I much prefer the white 360. Though neither are as ugly as the PS3.
cambookpro
Oct 20, 11:04 AM
It was a joke. Li-Ion. As in "Lion" (the animal in the picture..?)
Never mind, most people got it.
Lol! :D
Never mind, most people got it.
Lol! :D
techfreak85
Feb 14, 09:00 PM
nice! what kind of times per frame are you getting in OS X?
Between 35:30 -38:00 mins depending if I am using it/leave stuff open and running. It's like 2 mins faster in Windows.:(
Between 35:30 -38:00 mins depending if I am using it/leave stuff open and running. It's like 2 mins faster in Windows.:(
toddybody
Mar 24, 11:21 AM
here's hoping they have fixed the light leakage issue plaguing the iPads that have shipped thus far otherwise they may as well push shipping Estimates out 6 months because these things are defective
My White 16GB Wifi has the bleed. Taking it back to Walmart tomorrow...32GB White ordered online last week. Youre right, it isnt a hyped thing...the issue exist alot.
My White 16GB Wifi has the bleed. Taking it back to Walmart tomorrow...32GB White ordered online last week. Youre right, it isnt a hyped thing...the issue exist alot.
twoodcc
Aug 24, 09:26 PM
So I got the GTX 480 and was messing around with getting it running without any luck. I'll have to spend some more time with it and getting windows installed on the 980x machine. I tried swapping it with a gt 260 but it didn't want to run, it was getting errors.
you have to run the gpu3 client to get it to work. it has to get a core15 unit. gpu2 uses core11 (you can actually get core11 in gpu3, but they only work on 200 series gpus)
i can help you with this if you need it. are you running just the 480, or the 480 with another card?
you have to run the gpu3 client to get it to work. it has to get a core15 unit. gpu2 uses core11 (you can actually get core11 in gpu3, but they only work on 200 series gpus)
i can help you with this if you need it. are you running just the 480, or the 480 with another card?
plumosa
Mar 5, 09:25 AM
Wow! That couple needs some serious marriage counseling. Hopefully, they can work out their issues and get back to a healthy marriage.
riiiighhhht. because all marriages should be saved, even if its abusive!
riiiighhhht. because all marriages should be saved, even if its abusive!
smugDrew
Apr 12, 03:42 AM
Seems bleeding obvious really.
Anyway, what's more important to me is - when is the new MBA coming :eek:
Anyway, what's more important to me is - when is the new MBA coming :eek:
Moyank24
Mar 7, 01:13 AM
I have to disagree. I doubt she was knowingly placing herself in harm's way. Jumping on the hood of a vehicle is dramatic, but I doubt she expected her husband to start driving, much less at speeds of 100 mph. As he started moving, she probably expected him to stop briefly to let her off; instead he just kept driving faster and faster.
Unless she could reasonably foresee her husband driving on the freeway at 100 mph with her still on the hood, then she did not "knowingly place herself in harm's way." And I don't think his actions were reasonably foreseeable by any means.
Besides, let's say for example that Spouse A is holding a gun, and Spouse B jumps in front of the gun to prevent "A" from shooting his/her favorite Ming Dynasty Vase (it's a priceless original, after all). Spouse A shoots anyway, killing Spouse B. ...Who's to blame? Spouse A for pulling the trigger, or Spouse B for protecting their vase? Even if standing in front of a gun is "stupid," I think it hardly fair to hold Spouse B accountable for Spouse A's actions of pulling the trigger.
It simply isn't acceptable to try to kill your wife, and that's exactly what this man did.
If a husband wanted to leave and his wife blocked the car, then you walk. You call a cab, take a bus, call a friend. You don't drive at speeds of 100 mph with her on the hood, unless stopping endangers your life as well (but nothing in the story indicates this to be the case). It's an inexcusable action, regardless of the circumstances.
The guy has some substance abuse problems, so how could she jump on a car and not think she was putting herself in harms way? A rational person might not drive with his wife on the hood, but this guy some history of drugs; which she obviously knows about. Add anger in the mix, and nothing good will come of it.
If the woman was willing to jump on a car, do you really think she would have let him walk away? She would have jumped on the cab, or flagged the bus down. Who knows? He could have made the situation worse by getting out of the car. The point is...he was trying to leave the situation and she wouldn't let him.
The guy is probably going to plead or be found guilty of attempted murder...but if she just let him leave, and stayed off the hood of the darned car, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Unless she could reasonably foresee her husband driving on the freeway at 100 mph with her still on the hood, then she did not "knowingly place herself in harm's way." And I don't think his actions were reasonably foreseeable by any means.
Besides, let's say for example that Spouse A is holding a gun, and Spouse B jumps in front of the gun to prevent "A" from shooting his/her favorite Ming Dynasty Vase (it's a priceless original, after all). Spouse A shoots anyway, killing Spouse B. ...Who's to blame? Spouse A for pulling the trigger, or Spouse B for protecting their vase? Even if standing in front of a gun is "stupid," I think it hardly fair to hold Spouse B accountable for Spouse A's actions of pulling the trigger.
It simply isn't acceptable to try to kill your wife, and that's exactly what this man did.
If a husband wanted to leave and his wife blocked the car, then you walk. You call a cab, take a bus, call a friend. You don't drive at speeds of 100 mph with her on the hood, unless stopping endangers your life as well (but nothing in the story indicates this to be the case). It's an inexcusable action, regardless of the circumstances.
The guy has some substance abuse problems, so how could she jump on a car and not think she was putting herself in harms way? A rational person might not drive with his wife on the hood, but this guy some history of drugs; which she obviously knows about. Add anger in the mix, and nothing good will come of it.
If the woman was willing to jump on a car, do you really think she would have let him walk away? She would have jumped on the cab, or flagged the bus down. Who knows? He could have made the situation worse by getting out of the car. The point is...he was trying to leave the situation and she wouldn't let him.
The guy is probably going to plead or be found guilty of attempted murder...but if she just let him leave, and stayed off the hood of the darned car, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Bacong
Apr 4, 11:40 AM
+1 from me when my taxes come.
steve2112
Mar 5, 11:34 AM
I have better sense than to jump up there in the first place.
I believe in people taking responsibility for their actions. The guy should have stopped. The woman should never have jumped up there. But I'm afraid of establishing a legal precedent that says it's okay to put yourself into a bad situation and then blame someone else for how it turns out.
Isn't that the basis of the modern legal system in the US? It's always some else's fault. Preferably someone with deep pockets.
I believe in people taking responsibility for their actions. The guy should have stopped. The woman should never have jumped up there. But I'm afraid of establishing a legal precedent that says it's okay to put yourself into a bad situation and then blame someone else for how it turns out.
Isn't that the basis of the modern legal system in the US? It's always some else's fault. Preferably someone with deep pockets.
Teh Don Ditty
Dec 7, 10:49 AM
Angry much? Sending a submission takes all of 10 seconds. If you choose not to, then you are no worse off than you are now.
I see you are on Long Island, where your attitude runs rampant (lived there for years so I can speak to it). I'm sure others will gladly submit on your behalf. By the way, my 3G service on Long Island was excellent, so I'm assuming you are in Nassau county?
Clearly you are missing the point, why should I have to do AT&T's work for them?
Generalization much?
I see you are on Long Island, where your attitude runs rampant (lived there for years so I can speak to it). I'm sure others will gladly submit on your behalf. By the way, my 3G service on Long Island was excellent, so I'm assuming you are in Nassau county?
Clearly you are missing the point, why should I have to do AT&T's work for them?
Generalization much?
Flowbee
Aug 17, 05:22 PM
getting the option to rent movies on itunes will be great. hell even to rent with a burn to disc option would be even better.
Burn to DVD would definitely be a nice option, but I usually just hook my iPod to my TV (http://podophile.com/2006/08/16/watch-ipod-videos-on-your-tv/) with the $19 AV cable. I wouldn't be too surprised if Apple initially pushes this option over DVD burning.
Burn to DVD would definitely be a nice option, but I usually just hook my iPod to my TV (http://podophile.com/2006/08/16/watch-ipod-videos-on-your-tv/) with the $19 AV cable. I wouldn't be too surprised if Apple initially pushes this option over DVD burning.
brownie
Jan 10, 02:08 AM
Yeh i am kind of annoyed that Leopard nore iLife and iWork were not even mentioned at the keynote.
I have been waiting for iLife 07 to come out, so finally i can buy a macbook without having to purchase it seperately.
Hopefully i can hold off for a few months or whatever and then finally purchase it with Leopard and iLife 07.
I have been waiting for iLife 07 to come out, so finally i can buy a macbook without having to purchase it seperately.
Hopefully i can hold off for a few months or whatever and then finally purchase it with Leopard and iLife 07.
fleshman03
Apr 5, 10:19 PM
You think his fat ass would blend?
Can't believe MacRumors wrote a story on this. Werenn't the 2 or 3 threads on it enough? :rolleyes:
It's funny. Come on!
Besides, from the dude with the baseball bat to the "Will It Blend," the iPad seems to hold up for quite a while. I'm pretty impressed.
Can't believe MacRumors wrote a story on this. Werenn't the 2 or 3 threads on it enough? :rolleyes:
It's funny. Come on!
Besides, from the dude with the baseball bat to the "Will It Blend," the iPad seems to hold up for quite a while. I'm pretty impressed.
seisend
Apr 19, 03:09 AM
At the Supermeet presentation, the guy said "And it's only $299, which means you don't have to decide who gets a copy" (or words to that effect). THe last bit was drowned out by the crowd, but he meant that you no longer have to give everyone FCP/Motion/Color/STP/Cinema Tools if all they need is FCP.
yes.
you guys keep in mind that ONLY FCP is 299. I think Final Cut Pro STUDIO will be around 500-600 Dollar. Still a "Pro-User" pricing so to speak. So most Pro's will go for the suite anyway. I think it's great that Apple is selling the programm itself for this price. It keeps Final Cut Pro alive and I hope that it will be updated more frequently because hopefully more people will use it.
yes.
you guys keep in mind that ONLY FCP is 299. I think Final Cut Pro STUDIO will be around 500-600 Dollar. Still a "Pro-User" pricing so to speak. So most Pro's will go for the suite anyway. I think it's great that Apple is selling the programm itself for this price. It keeps Final Cut Pro alive and I hope that it will be updated more frequently because hopefully more people will use it.
BeSweeet
Apr 26, 01:20 PM
I wish somebody would take a photo of the dock connector and the headphone jack to see if those are white as well (they should be).
If it's anything like Apple's other white products, every part will have a different shade of white after a while.
If it's anything like Apple's other white products, every part will have a different shade of white after a while.
konquererkarlos
Oct 17, 11:22 AM
People with PCs must not leave their houses much...I've been to coffee shops and airports all over, and it seems about half of the laptops I see are Apple.
I concurr. Almost every concert I go to now, I see a MacBook on stage. I see mac notebooks everywhere. One thing I hate is when i see people dissuading potential buyers away from macintoshes, simply because Windows is the more common operating system, when most of the time, these are new computer buyers and wouldn't be able to use Wwindows in the first place.
I concurr. Almost every concert I go to now, I see a MacBook on stage. I see mac notebooks everywhere. One thing I hate is when i see people dissuading potential buyers away from macintoshes, simply because Windows is the more common operating system, when most of the time, these are new computer buyers and wouldn't be able to use Wwindows in the first place.
Frisco
Nov 13, 12:42 PM
Great news! I was worried M$ recruited him for Zune commercials.
robby818
Apr 11, 01:47 AM
There is a new method of producing carbon fiber called "chopped carbon fiber." It might make sense for Apple to use something like this as opposed to woven carbon fiber, which is very expensive to manufacture.
http://wot.motortrend.com/lamborghini-experimenting-chopped-fiber-suspension-parts-future-cars-37577.html
http://wot.motortrend.com/lamborghini-experimenting-chopped-fiber-suspension-parts-future-cars-37577.html
PBF
Oct 4, 12:02 PM
I hope iWeb has some sorta 3D text rendering.
Please, let it happen since no other program lets you do it in 3 easy steps.
Please, let it happen since no other program lets you do it in 3 easy steps.
